This is a great opportunity for the camera companies. So what if the public is rejecting point-and-shoots? Those were the near beers of the industry anyway. What is sure to happen now is that some of these smartphone owners will want to squeeze out more color, sharpness, and depth of field than their itsy-bitsy camera phones can deliver.
So, no more easing consumers into the hobby. The camera guys can move them straight into plunking down of real money on real equipment. Let me explain, using myself as an example.
And I'm just getting started. I'm now in the market for a wide-angle lens, a new tripod and better editing software. I just signed up for a photography class. Here's the best part for Nikon: I don't even mind. For me, the cost is worth it. Few of my pursuits have delivered as much satisfaction and enjoyment.
![]() |
| The photo was taken with a Nikon D-7000 using a focal length of 142mm. Photo by Greg Sandoval/CNET |
Obviously, I'm not alone. During a trip to Paris and London (excellent places to gauge the health of amateur photography), a street performer with a soccer ball wowed onlookers at the Sacre-Coeur Basilica when he began dribbling the ball on his feet as he hung from a light post.
No sooner had the performer started into his act when seemingly everyone in the audience, all at once, reached for one kind of camera or another. Yes, a lot of people whipped out smartphones--but I also saw dozens of SLRs. I was asked by strangers to snap their pictures five times that day. I was handed two smart phones, one SLR, one point and shoot and one old film camera (you're welcome, hipster).
